As LA Tries To Tackle Looming Budget Crisis, City Has Spent Nearly $500 Million On Liability Claims
Topline:
Los Angeles spent nearly $472 million on liability claims from July 2019 through this past June, according to data released Wednesday by the L.A. City Controller’s Office.
The backstory: Liability claims are payments the city makes to people it has injured when it’s failed to meet its responsibilities, or when officials and employees directly harm people, or fail to prevent avoidable harm. And a “significant portion” of the money comes out of the general fund, which pays for city services and resources, the controller’s office said in a statement.
These payouts are nothing new, as local city and county government has paid out massive amounts of money over recent decades.
Why now: The controller's office released the data saying it hopes it helps the city “better manage its responsibilities and avoid the kinds of risk and harm that give rise to liability claims and payments.”
Why it matters: L.A. may be heading toward a possible budget crisis. The city administrative officer warned in January that L.A. was taking in less money than forecast and spending more — some $297 million in "overspending." The biggest share of those increased costs ($97 million) is tied to a new LAPD contract, the city administrator said.
How the liability costs break down: The LAPD made up more than a quarter of the total liability claim payouts for that period — about $125 million. The Bureau of Sanitation had the second highest with nearly $94 million in payouts, followed by the Bureau of Street Services with more than $88 million.
The agencies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the latest report.
What they were for: The highest paid liability claim categories were for dangerous conditions and traffic collisions. Out of the LAPD’s 1,284 claims, more than 800 were for traffic accidents, including failing to stop / yield, rear ends, or unsafe lane changes. For the Bureau of Sanitation, more than 93% of the payouts were for traffic collision claims.
Go deeper: Check out the controller's data here.
-
As the March 5 primary draws closer, many of us have yet to vote and are looking for some help. We hope you start with our Voter Game Plan. Since we don't do recommendations, we've also put together a list of other popular voting guides.
-
Evaluating judicial candidates is notoriously hard, but there are a few pieces of information you can look at to help with your decision.
-
There are a 11 candidates running against incumbent George Gascón to be L.A. County's next District Attorney. It's a powerful and influential role that determines what crimes get prosecuted — and whether certain crimes should be considered felonies or misdemeanors.
-
County records obtained by LAist show O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do directed an additional $6.2 million in taxpayer dollars to his 22-year-old daughter’s group without publicly disclosing the family ties.
-
It’s the second high-profile instance to emerge recently of O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do not disclosing a relevant family relationship during official proceedings.
-
Top OC Official Helped Direct Millions To His Daughter’s Center Without Disclosing Family ConnectionOver the past year, Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do was involved in directing $3.1 million to a mental health center where his daughter, Rhiannon Do, was president.